Archive for Evangelicalism

God’s Green Kingdom and the Pain of Change [Updated]

I’m really excited about the three interdisciplinary tracks that are part of FC08. Of the three, I am especially intrigued by God’s Green Kingdom, chaired by Dr. Rusty Pritchard. The Christian community is becoming increasingly aware of our responsibility for creation care. Groups like Evangelicals for Social Action and the Evangelical Environmental Network have led the way in this.

For a long time talk of conservation, hybrids, and simple living was the domain of hippies and liberals. Now the evangelical church is maturing in our theology of creation.

Counselors often tell us that we change only when the pain of remaining the same is greater than the pain of change. With the price of oil going through the roof and Americans seriously addicted to automobiles, especially big automobiles, the pain of staying the same is intensifying.

And it seems that our way of living is in the process of changing at a fundamental levels. I’m not talking simply turning off the A/C in your F-350 and rolling down the windows. I’m talking profound changes in the way he travel, where we work and where we live.

Rod Dreher of Crunchy Con has an interesting post pointing this out. Read it here. He links to several articles indicating that America is on the verge of a serious economic earthquake. Especially interesting is a web-tool that allows the user to calculate the real cost of living in the suburbs by factoring in the cost of travel (i.e., premium gas for your Suburban). Makes me glad that I live in a little cottage three miles from downtown.

Comments

Yup. We’re going there … The Obama-Dobson Quarrel [Updated]

I opened my browser yesterday morning and pulled up cnn.com. It’s sort of part of my morning routine. Get a cup of coffee. Open the MacBook. Scan my RSS feeds. Check the news. You get the picture.

Yesterday’s headline was the very public quarrel between conservative Christian leader James Dobson of Focus on the Family and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.

The issue? Biblical interpretation. Specifically, Dobson took Obama to task for a 2006 speech delivered at Call to Renewal, a gathering of progressive/liberal Christians. Read the text of the speech here.

The original CNN piece is here.

I’m going to go out on a limb (not really) and say that if you’re the sort of person who’s interested in Following Christ 2008, you’re probably also interested in being a redeeming influence in culture. Right? You’re probably also someone who spends most of your life in a that highly pluralistic environment known as the university.

So the issue raised in this little (and very public) tiff is actually quite germane to your life.

I don’t want to get into the specifics of the quarrel, you can read the CNN piece for that. I do want to consider one of Obama’s assertions. It just so happens that it is one that Dobson took issue with, but never mind.

Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God’s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all.

- Barack Obama, Keynote Address, Call to Renewal.

I believe that Obama is right.

Christians have for centuries believed that there exist not only the (specific) revelation of Scripture, but general revelation in nature and reason. This general revelation could also be called Natural Law. As a result, it is possible to converse with those outside of the Christian faith on the basis of first things, moral principles that are knowable outside of Scripture. This means that we can discuss policies from a Christian perspective without using explicitly Christian language.

It doesn’t mean (and I don’t think Obama suggests) that Christians/the Church should abandon reflection on Scripture as a basis for views on all sorts of issues. After all, it is not only our “religious selves” that are Christ’s, we are Christ’s in our entirety (whole persons).

Religion seems like its going to be an issue in this election, but not as it was in 2000 and 2004. We’ve already seen a battle over the “reverends,” both with Obama (Wright and Pfleger) and McCain (Hagee and Parsley). Who knows what else we see before November.

For other interesting discussion see Erin Manning’s response to Jim Wallis’s response to Jim Dobson at Crunchy Con.

Comments (4)

Elites: Leaving Church?

“The way that leaders have loosened their ties to churches in their own communities–in the places where they live and work–is deeply troubling. It signals the loss of one of the few social settings where the average “Joes” used to rub shoulders with the powerful, and where the powerful kept in touch with the concerns of average folks.” - Michael Lindsay, author of Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite.

A recent op ed piece in USA Today by Mchael Lindsay laments the departure of evangelical elites from local churches.

Lindsay spent five years interviewing some of the country’s top leaders. These included two former U.S. presidents, 100 CEOs and business executives, Hollywood icons, accomplished artists and renowned athletes, all of whom openly identify as Christians of the evangelical variety.

During the course of these interviews, Lindsay discovered that some 60% of these cultural leaders were not involved with a congregation in any meaningful way. Some of them were members, a designation that often did not translate into meaningful participation in the life of the community of faith. Others had actively disengaged from church life and sought spiritual development through other means.

Several CEOs, for example, noted their frustration that churches seemed intent on maximizing inefficiency. Churches, some claim, are “unproductive,” and “focused on the wrong things.” A substitute for such a frustrating experience can be service on the board of an organization such as the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, the very zenith of evangelical groups. Why mess around with a church when you can function in the boardroom of a global organization?

In some ways this is a natural expression of the evangelical impulse that favors efficiency and also of our preoccupation with impact. To many evangelicals small is irrelevant and local is vanilla. We prefer our leaders to be icons who inspire global movements with strong brands and multiple spin-off products for our niche market. A church, after all, may only be able to reach a community, but a satellite broadcast can reach millions around the globe.

That this is a natural expression, however, makes it neither helpful nor right. And this development shows that the (already weakened) fabric of evangelical ecclesiology may be at the point of unraveling.

Evangelicals have launched hundreds of invitation-only programs and organizations for everybody from business leaders in Manhattan to diplomats in Washington. This is a good thing, a means of seeking to contextualize the Gospel and Kingdom values to a specific place or profession. It’s my job, after all, to help do just this at Wake Forest so I’m not knocking it. However, these innovations mean nothing should they serve to sunder individual believers from the community of the church. The very robustness of these groups is based on the bedrock of a visibly community of people united to Christ through baptism and sharing life together as they follow Christ.

Let’s face it, Following Christ 2008 is a conference for people who may well one day fit into the constituencies outlined above. And certainly if and when you find yourself working in DC or on Wall Street, you will want some time of fellowship with others similarly situated. But that fellowship, as helpful as it may be, will fail to meet the full scope of our spiritual needs.

For the purpose of meeting these needs, God instituted the church. That evangelical elites are abandoning the church is worrisome not only in that it perpetuates the divorce between average Joes and elites, but more so in that it is a trend toward the abandoning of God’s primary redemptive vehicle. Does the church do some silly things? Sure. Does it sometimes seem like we’re trying very hard to show people the door? Yes. However, all of this doesn’t change the fact that the church is foundational.

John Calvin notes:

“[L]et us learn, from her single title of Mother, how useful, nay, how necessary the knowledge of her is, since there is no other means of entering into life unless she conceive us in the womb and give us birth, unless she nourish us at her breasts, and, in short, keep us under her charge and government, until, divested of mortal flesh, we become like angels. For our weakness does not permit us to leave the school until we gave spent our whole lives as scholars. Moreover, beyond the pale of the Church no forgiveness of sins, no salvation, can be hoped for….” Institutes 1: 4

There is nothing wrong with being involved with a myriad of evangelical organizations that relate to your specific vocation. However, it can never be a substitute for your membership and participation in that new community called church.

Comments